General NAS-Central Forums

Welcome to the NAS community
It is currently Sat Oct 21, 2017 6:50 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 140 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 8:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:47 pm
Posts: 93
First, please to restore the standard USB disk mount mode...

With your output, it is amazing that the firmware failed to mount at least sej1
Code:
Jan 16 20:41:11 lacie5big local2.notice sudo:     root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/ ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/bin/mount -t vfat -o umask=000,codepage=850,iocharset=utf8 /dev/sej1 /share/2000
Jan 16 20:41:11 lacie5big local0.warn API[2016/01/16 20:41:11] exthddfunc_mountUsbRpiHdd.finc(429)[7207]: failed to mount sej1 at /share/2000


What returns the commands
Code:
mkdir /mnt/EFI-1
/bin/mount -t vfat -o umask=000,codepage=850,iocharset=utf8 /dev/sej1 /mnt/EFI-1


same thing with sej2
Code:
mkdir /mnt/ServerBackUp_2
/bin/mount -t hfsplus -o noatime,ro /dev/sej2 /mnt/ServerBackUp_2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:50 pm
Posts: 88
so what shall I do Jocko?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:50 pm
Posts: 88
Attachment:
Screen Shot 2016-01-17 at 00.02.04.png
even more amazing that after having restored the standard usb mode, the external drive doesn't show up at all anymore...


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:47 pm
Posts: 93
Maybe you misunderstand me: you must try the two mount commands specified in my last post .

Note: it is very amazing that now the firmware fails to mount sej1 partition as it is a fat partition :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:50 pm
Posts: 88
Jocko wrote:
Maybe you misunderstand me: you must try the two mount commands specified in my last post .

Note: it is very amazing that now the firmware fails to mount sej1 partition as it is a fat partition :?:

I did misunderstand you indeed Jocko...I'm at work again today so take care of it when back at home later on today.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 11:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:47 pm
Posts: 93
Ok


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:50 pm
Posts: 88
Jocko wrote:
What returns the commands
Code:
mkdir /mnt/EFI-1
/bin/mount -t vfat -o umask=000,codepage=850,iocharset=utf8 /dev/sej1 /mnt/EFI-1


Code:
root@lacie5big:/ # mkdir /mnt/EFI-1
root@lacie5big:/ # /bin/mount -t vfat -o umask=000,codepage=850,iocharset=utf8 /
dev/sej1 /mnt/EFI-1
mount: /dev/sej1: can't read superblock


Jocko wrote:
same thing with sej2
Code:
mkdir /mnt/ServerBackUp_2
/bin/mount -t hfsplus -o noatime,ro /dev/sej2 /mnt/ServerBackUp_2

Code:
root@lacie5big:/ # mkdir /mnt/ServerBackUp_2
root@lacie5big:/ # /bin/mount -t hfsplus -o noatime,ro /dev/sej2 /mnt/ServerBack
Up_2
mount: unknown filesystem type 'hfsplus'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:45 am
Posts: 6049
macdalor wrote:
Code:
root@lacie5big:/direct-usb # gdisk -l /dev/sej
<snip>
Disk /dev/sej: 732558336 sectors, 2.7 TiB
Logical sector size: 4096 bytes
<snip>
Can you mount that disk using that USB enclosure on another system? Many USB enclosures will use a 4096B sector size when the disk is bigger than 2TiB, to bypass MBR limits for Windows XP.
Nothing /really/ wrong with that, but if the disk was partitioned using another interface (direct sata, for instance), the partition table might be based on 512B sectors. That doesn't fit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:50 pm
Posts: 88
It mounts fine on my MBPs...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:13 pm
Posts: 773
HFS and HFS+ is not suppurted by the 3.14.2 kirkwood kernel #8

Code:
CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS=m
CONFIG_MISC_FILESYSTEMS=y
# CONFIG_ADFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_AFFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_HFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_BEFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_BFS_FS is not set
# CONFIG_EFS_FS is not set


Further partition type EF is not same as FAT32 (ID =b or c (with LBA).

So I think the problem is that you try to mount files systems that are not supported by our kernel


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:50 pm
Posts: 88
I understand...shame that is...I'll find an aternative...thx for all your help guys, you've already saved my box from the trash so ever so thankful !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:13 pm
Posts: 773
I can recomplie the kernel to add hfs and hfs+ support


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:47 pm
Posts: 93
@Milzelf
Code:
root@lacie5big:/direct-usb # gdisk -l /dev/sej
<snip>
Disk /dev/sej: 732558336 sectors, 2.7 TiB
Logical sector size: 4096 bytes
<snip>
Where did you read this macdalor's feedback

Otherwise, there is something wrong now with your sej1 partition as presviously the firmware can mount it
Code:
mount: /dev/sej1: can't read superblock


And yes fvdw your are right it was the goal of the try to mount manually the sej2 (see if kernel support this fs)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:13 pm
Posts: 773
I will recompile the kernel with support for HFS and HFS+ loaded as modules, if they are big. If the modules are small I will included them in the kernel so you don't need to load modules
(will be posted on plugout)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 4:50 pm
Posts: 88
@Jocko

Not too sure what happened here but I can still read my external usb drive fine from the OSX and windows platforms (thx god for that 'cause this is my backup! ;) ). It doesn't seem to have changed in any ways and only started to be hidden once I've installed the last patch; Not sure that can be a lead...

@fvdw
If you can enable support for large HFS and HFS+, well, then it'd be fantastic! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 140 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group